Apply NOW: 6 Steps to Apply to the Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk

Posted by Trieneke Gastmeier and Don Richardson

on Dec 9, 2015 4:26:35 PM

Check Your Pocket

The Caribou has been a Canadian icon since appearing on our quarters in 1936. But the Caribou on your quarter is in trouble in many parts of Canada, especially where their forest habitat is disturbed or fragmented.  

The Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk (AFSAR) call for proposals is now open.  The program will be accepting Expressions of Interest until December 18th, 2015. The submission of an Expression of Interest is strongly encouraged, particularly for applicants who have not received AFSAR funding in the past or for those applying to a new stream.  The deadline for proposal submissions is January 15th, 2016.  Below, we provide six key steps for creating an AFSAR application.

Read More

Topics: BEAHR Training, Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Assessments, Traditional Knowledge and Land Use Studies, Aboriginal Land and Water Stewards

Indigenous Environmental Monitoring: Why Bother?

Posted by Don Richardson and Scott Mackay

on Nov 13, 2015 10:48:53 AM


Caribou horns of a dilemma: put time, money and energy into developing indigenous environmental monitoring efforts


stick to hiring outside technical consulting firms?

Indigenous Environmental Monitoring: Why Bother?

When big infrastructure and resource extraction projects intersect with traditional territories, many First Nation, Inuit and Métis communities get deeply engaged in environmental assessment processes and project implementation agreements (sometimes called Impact Benefit Agreements (IBAs) or Long-term Relationship Agreements(LTRAs)).  Negotiating comprehensive and meaningful environmental monitoring is usually a key part of these important agreements.  If you are involved in such agreement discussions as a community, company or regulatory representative, at some point, you will make decisions about if, and how, to take on community-based environmental monitoring activities.  

But is it worth putting all the negotiation time and effort into these arrangements between multiple parties, or is it easier to just keep on hiring outside technical consulting firms to do the monitoring work and provide the reports to management or co-management teams?  Is it worth doing the hard upfront negotiation work to put in place environmental monitoring programs?  Putting these together usually involves commitments of time and money for capacity building (e.g. "BEAHR" training for environmental monitors and managers), and organizational development, for indigenous participation in environmental management through environmental committees and ongoing community consultation.  It can be tempting for companies to simply contract outside technical consulting firm.  It can be tempting for indigenous communities to simply receive and review environmental monitoring reports that others create.


As we like to say, "SHIFT HAPPENS": our experience suggests that indigenous environmental monitoring simply makes projects better for all parties.  Environmental monitoring and management programs provide communities with their own eyes, ears and boots on the ground to see for themselves if commitments and environmental enhancement projects are really working.  When enviromental monitoring and management programs are well developed inside IBA or LTRA agreements, they can help detect and respond to the many environmental changes and shifts that happen within and around project life cycles that might otherwise go un- or under-detected.  And indigenous peoples can be enabled to provide services on the ground that are far better tied to local needs than services provided by technical consultants, "from away", who provide monitoring services for hire.  

Having ‎indigenous monitors working for and reporting to indigenous communities can be supplemented with indigenous monitors as employees or contractors of the company who can communicate in an informed way (with whistle-blower protection) to the community about what happens day-in and day-out on the project site with respect to monitoring, protection, or event response. This benefits all parties. With more and more focus on the rights of indigenous peoples, "Free, Prior and Informed Consent" and indigenous and industry partnerships, indigenous enviornmental monitoring and management simply makes good sense - and it is here to stay.

The following list of benefits is based on recent Shared Value Solutions' experiences with First Nation environmental monitors on mining, oil and gas, power, and pipeline projects, and negotiation discussions on integrating Métis environmental monitors and Inuit environmental monitors within a variety of "follow-on" programs tied to environmental assessments, IBAs and LTRAs in Canada.  

Read More

Topics: BEAHR Training, Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Assessments, Aboriginal and Industry Partnerships, Aboriginal Land and Water Stewards

Premier Wynne’s Priorities for Ontario: Mining and the Ring of Fire

Posted by Don Richardson

on Sep 26, 2014 6:20:00 AM

Read More

Topics: BEAHR Training, Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Assessments, B Corporations, Premier Wynne's Mandates, Mining

Aboriginal Environmental Monitors & Land Use Planners: BEAHR Training

Posted by Don Richardson

on Sep 21, 2014 7:05:00 AM

Read More

Topics: BEAHR Training